Sanctuary California - Feds Bust 22 MS-13 Members Over String of Ghoulish Murders

July 17, 2019 - San Francisco - - An investigation by federal and local authorities has resulted in a federal racketeering case that charges 22 people linked to the MS-13 transnational gang, most of whom allegedly participated in a series of murders, including several slayings in which victims were hacked to death with machetes in the Angeles National Forest.

A 12-count indictment unsealed Monday [7.15.19] afternoon alleges that members and associates of the gang murdered seven people over the last two years. The indictment charges gang leaders who allegedly authorized and coordinated the murders. Also charged are gang members who allegedly murdered and attempted to murder rival gang members, those who were perceived to be cooperating with law enforcement, and, in one instance, a homeless man who was temporarily living in a park controlled by the gang.

The indictment focuses on a particularly violent subset of the gang known as the Fulton clique, which operates in the San Fernando Valley and has recently seen an influx of young immigrants from Central America. Under the influence of these young gangsters, younger associates who wanted to become members of MS-13 were “required to kill an MS-13 rival or someone perceived to be adverse to MS-13 to be initiated into MS-13,” according to the indictment.

In one murder detailed in the indictment, several MS-13 members allegedly targeted a rival gang member who was believed to have defaced MS-13 graffiti. On March 6, 2017, according to the indictment, the rival gang member was abducted, choked, and driven to a remote location in the Angeles National Forest, where six people attacked him with a machete. The victim was dismembered, and his body parts were thrown into a canyon after one of the defendants allegedly cut the heart out of the victim’s body.

[Read More]
CA Politicians and their Heaven-on-Earth Plan


July 14, 2019 - San Francisco - California Right to Life News - The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help, the sage coinage of which is attributed to Ronald Reagan and first used during a campaign speech.

At the time everybody laughed, but in the years since it’s become obvious that the government wants American citizens to cede our rightful, God given freedoms, responsibilities and even our children over to them.

During the first part of the 21st century they have, most notably under successive Obama Administrations, doubled down on their headlong push towards supervising and planning-for-all by creating public private partnerships, joining government and non-profit i.e. non-elected private community groups into ventures with profit making results. These groups include Planned Parenthood , school-based health clinics, PTA’s, LGBTQ advocates and dozens of non-profit Social/emotional learning groups who now, thanks to legislation, have access to the schools and to the training of teachers .

Legislators, media, are constantly employing fear tactics about the physical and mental health and well-being of our children, that is ifwe fail to let the elected officials and their cohorts run our lives for us. This is all caused, so they claim, by parents and citizens who fail to realize the benefits to be derived from a gracious government wanting to “help.”

The edutcratic-political elite have created a legislative mandate that will require that every child receive a mental health or trauma-post traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]-experience evaluation.

For example AB1005, by Democrat Joaquin Arambula seeks to create an extensive bureaucracy to help foster children and youth through what he calls a “Family Urgent Response System.” This would follow the guidelines set for the Continuum of Care legislation created previously to help children, “heal from trauma and thrive”

Yeah that last part is a direct cop from the famous Kaiser-Permanente Medical advertising “tag line."

[Read More]
Of Course Google, Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest, et al., are Publishers


July 8, 2019 - San Francisco - – As this author has stated on numerous occasions on these pages; in a previous life I worked within the hard copy publishing business - both magazine and newspaper, so I bring a bit of real world insight to this topic that might be missing from other commentators dealing with the associated issues…those being just where do the Internet Goliaths shake out regarding the Telecommunication’s Act of 1996, specifically Section 230 (c)(2) , which amends and redefines the definition of “publisher” as set forth originally in the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) [note: also please refer to the FCC’s clearinghouse page for the 1996 Act]

“(1) TREATMENT OF PUBLISHER OR SPEAKER - No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider….”

What this means in simple language is that the ‘Net based Masters of the World are statutorily exempt from prosecution even if they “provide” information that is defamatory and/or libelous.

The measure was written, passed and signed into law fully 2 years BEFORE Google was even launched [1998] so it’s not hard to grasp that this exemption was carved-out [GOP Congress, Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House, thank you very much guys] in an ignorant and thoroughly blind matter, legislatively setting rules for a world that didn’t yet exist [!].

Aside from the obvious folly of such over-reaching by Congress, there remains what today is the money question, “should Google & Co be allowed to continue heavily manipulating the distribution of news information to serve a political outcome or purpose?”

[Read More]
Iran’s Mullahs Feeling the Pinch


July 6, 2019 - San Francisco - - President Hassan Rouhani’s bellicosity notwithstanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran is on the verge of collapse upon the heads of the despised Mullahs and their emblematic Revolutionary Guards…

Many pundits and experts have speculated that it is just a matter of time before the confrontation between the world and Iran’s Mullahs. Especially, after President Donald Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal, which could possibly set off a catastrophic conflagration. The present standoff is bound to change, either by the U.S. use of force to make good on its threat that a nuclear Iran is not acceptable, or the Mullahs will manage to make the unacceptable an accomplished fact.

Although the main adversaries are the U.S. and Iran, much of the world has a huge stake in regard to this potentially catastrophic confrontation. Israel, the Persian Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iraq as well as nations farther away from the region are both willing and unwilling parties to this unfolding crisis.

The situation is dire indeed. Anyone who believes that sane rational people on both sides are engaged in brinksmanship to secure the best advantage would eventually work out a compromise, is deluding himself. In some cases, time works as a healer and even as a solution to thorny problems. Yet, this problem will not go away, and time would only make the cataclysmic clash more likely and deadly. There is, however, a non-violent solution, without appeasement that offers the best chance to resolve the impasse: change of regime in Iran.

Selected President Hassan Rouhani’s bellicosity notwithstanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran is on the verge of collapse upon the heads of the despised Mullahs and their emblematic Revolutionary Guards, (IRGC). A few pushes from the outside world would serve as the tipping point for long-suffering Iranians to rise and bury the Mullahs in the graveyard they so richly deserve and have made of Iran.

[Read More]