PipeLineNews Archives: July 2017

Democrat Party/GOP/Deep State Engaged in Massive Cover-up of Awan Spy Ring

July 27, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – Item, Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ long-time chief IT professional, Imran Awan, was arrested in DC on Tuesday evening as he attempted to flee the country.

As we reported back in March, Awan, a Pakistani national, while under the employ of the disgraced Schultz [D-Fla, fired last summer as Chair of the DNC] engaged in a scheme where he, his two brothers and both of their wives received payments totaling at least $4 million from an undetermined number of Democrat Congressmen.

All 5 of the individuals were employed in one capacity or another as computer consultants. Additionally they were, during the same period of time, also involved in a dizzying array of side-ventures where funds were apparently being laundered, bankruptcies filed and considerable amounts of cash were being wired back to Pakistan.

It was Imran who took a lead role in the conspiracy which had targeted, “dozens of House Democrats, including members of the intelligence, foreign affairs and homeland security committees.” [Luke Rosiak, House Hacking Suspects Could Read Every Email Dozens Of Congressmen Sent And Received ]

Awan had been employed since 2004, meaning that he had free access to the House computer network for over a dozen years. Though representatives have denied that he had access to sensitive information, we find that to be an absurd and totally unbelievable assertion, one clearly being proffered as a lame “ass covering” gesture.

[Read More]
Why The “Peaceful” Islam Gambit Is A Cruel Joke

July 19, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – Though we have been through this innumerable times in many different formats, the advocates of a “de-radicalized” Islam are once again out in force pushing this same old tired meme.

Perhaps it’s best to present the contra-argument in a numbered list format…

1. As practiced normatively, Islam is a triumphal, war-like creed devoted to the simple tenet of spreading “Allah’s religion” so that it is “supreme above all others.” It follows then that every Muslim majority nation is governed by the Shari’a at one level or another. Many of these countries are full-blown Islamic theocracies where the “religious” cops far outnumber those dedicated to maintaining public order. In these countries, the gendarmerie approach their jobs with great zeal, making sure that single women don’t travel outside the home absent the accompaniment of a male family member, do not get behind the wheel of a car, wear hijab at a minimum when outside the home, that there are no displays of homosexuality and the multitude of other no-nos in Islam that apply to everyone, in most cases obliterating the freedoms that are part of our Western birthright.

It is this highly aggressive messianic nature of Islam that is irreducible and which serves as the public face that the Islamic world presents to the Western democracies making this the point where the two worlds are conflicted.

Since it is Islamic dogma that non-Muslims have three choices, convert, reject Islam but pay the head tax called the jizya or be killed it’s hard to understand how the dominant practice of Islam might be accommodated in a Western setting.

[Read More]
Clinton Administration Gave North Korea Two Nuclear Reactors…In 1994!

July 11, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – So much has recently been written about the very real threat of North Korea being able to use its ICBM technology to nuke the Western United States that many seem to think that the threat developed recently, out of thin air.

But that is not the case as 23 years ago, the Clinton administration, in what can only be described as a bizarre proposal, offered the North Koreans not one, but two fully function light water reactor.

Yes, you read that correctly Bill Clinton, his “co-president” Hillary along with the even then faltering Madeline Albright hoped that by gifting the Norks with advanced nuclear technology that would somehow stop their mad rush to obtain enough fissionable nuclear material to create weapons.

If this is news to you, then we suggest you look to the Deep State’s Praetorian Guard that refuses to contextualize anything that might reflect poorly on the tattered Clinton reputation or the Democrat party for that matter.

Actually we can find no reference to the 1994 agreement in any of the journalism regarding the current threat…as if it never happened.

In a typically misleading article published by the Los Angeles Times on October 19, 1994 one must scroll down nine paragraphs to find the money quote:

“In return for its concessions, North Korea will get two 1,000-megawatt light-water nuclear reactors valued at $4 billion. South Korea and Japan will supply most of the equipment and financing for those facilities.” [source, Jim Mann, Clinton OKs Deal to Stop N. Korea's Nuclear Program ]

Despite the clear intention of the MSM to deceive the public into thinking this was some kind of grand diplomatic victory, just about any high school physics teacher would likely be able to explain that nukes can still be constructed using light water reactors, though the process would be more difficult.

[Read More]
GOP Rep Gohmert: This Orwellian Oligarchy Has Got To Stop Before August
 


 

July 11, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – In the above video, Congressman Louie Gohmert [R-TX] joined Stuart Varney on Fox Business and discussed tax reform and healthcare efforts in Congress and the Senate.

The Congressman stressed the need to do both these before August.

Commenting on the disaster that ObamaCare represents, Gohmert noted:

“It is not so much that it is bureaucrats deciding what is best for you. It is bureaucrats rationing health care and deciding, -- well, you have had a good life – or maybe you don't have a chance of much more of a life, so you won't get help. But, this person over here may do something great...

[Read More]
“Humanitarian” Organizations In League With Libyan Migrant Traffickers In Mediterranean Sea Operations

By EMERSON VERMAAT

July 10, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - Italian prosecutors are investigating humanitarian organizations who send huge rescue ships just outside or even inside Libyan territorial waters where they pick up tens-of-thousands of, mostly African, economic migrants and subsequently provide them with a kind of “ferry service” to Southern Italy.

Two weeks ago, 12,000 migrants arrived in Italy in just a few days time!

It is believed that the rescuers are cooperating with ruthless Libyan migrant traffickers and are therefore facilitating illegal migration to the European Schengen area. This suspected cooperation nets the North African migrant traffickers huge profits on a daily basis. These migrant traffickers put their victims deliberately in unseaworthy inflatable boats or dinghies and then make cell or satellite phone calls to the rescue ships nearby.

Sicilian prosecutor Carmelo Zuccaro told the Amsterdam-based newspaper “De Telegraaf” that two rescue ships sailing under the Dutch flag are under investigation now. There are indications that they have made deals with criminal migrant trafficking gangs to facilitate these clandestine operations. One of the organizations that is being investigated is “Sea Watch,” but they deny, of course, that they are doing anything illegal. Sea Watch is owned by German nationals and the name applies to the rescue ship “Jugend Rettet,” also flying under Dutch colors.

Zuccaro says that another rescue ship called “Migrant Offshore Aid Station” is using drones and other sophisticated and expensive techniques with a view to quickly tracing the overcrowded inflatable boats close to the Libyan coast. “Aid to clandestine migration is punishable under certain circumstances,” Zuccaro says. Since these so-called rescue operations began, the number of economic migrants from Africa has increased drastically. Egyptians, Iraqis, Syrians and Lebanese are also using this Mediterranean route more and more now.

[Read More]

Islamic Mosqueteers Strike Again in the Heart of Europe

By VILLEM MAHERSTEIN

July 6, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - In an article published yesterday by the Gatestone Institute [Giulio Meotti, Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?] the author poses a rhetorical question that we will use as a platform from which to make several observations regarding the current state of journalistic confusion pertaining to Islam.

Mr. Meotti has, after sorting through previous columns and responses to them by knowledgeable people, a very good grasp of the cultural crisis Islamic immigration is posing to the Continent.

Pregnant pause…however, he does seem to flail around a bit in explaining the underlying dynamic. This is by no means a criticism, it’s a problem that all national security writers recognize but deal with in different ways, probably none of them ideal.

At the risk of being terse, though it has become something of a standardized grammatical form, the term “radical Islam” has no meaning…among Muslims at least.

Islam is what it is, which is why it’s common for imams to respond to the question, “what is Islam,” with the seemingly obtuse but nonetheless correct response “Islam is Islam.” This means that there is no such thing as varying degrees of being a Muslim, either one is or isn’t. If there is a “radical” Islamic Alpha then there are certainly other shades with perhaps “peaceful” being the “Westernized ideal” as the Omega.

[Read More]
Wholly Different: Why I Chose Biblical Values Over Islamic Values

Nonie Darwish; pp 325; ©2017; Regnery Faith; an imprint of Regnery Publishing; a division of Salem Media Group

As reviewed by CHERYL GATESWORTH

July 5, 2017 - San Francisco, CA – PipeLineNews.org - Nonie Darwish, an Egyptian born author and human rights activist who emigrated to the United States in 1978 has made a substantial contribution to the body of literature associated with understanding Islamic terrorism and the nature of the Shari’a - Islamic law. Having resided in America for more than thirty years, she has intimate experience in both the Islamic as well as the Judeo-Christian worlds. While in the United States she became a Christian, rejecting her former beliefs.

Darwish, who has authored three previous books, Now They Call Me Infidel , Cruel And Usual Punishment and The Devil We Don't Know has just published her newest and possibly most audacious work, Wholly Different: Why I Chose Biblical Values Over Islamic Values .

“Wholly Different” is a well-written and highly readable book that dissects and compares Biblical [Christian] values with those of Islam. She skillfully and knowledgeably compares Judeo-Christian values with those found primarily in the Qur’an but also in the Hadith [the sayings of the Prophet, Mohammed as related by his companions], and the Seerah [the life of Mohammed], these three works have long been taken to be the cornerstones of Islam.

In an era where only ideologically approved speech prevails - with Westerners encouraged to believe that Islam is a peaceful religion with a just and loving God virtually indistinguishable from Judaism and Christianity - her book is a much needed dose of truth.

Though it is an encyclopedic analysis, it is also a page-turner rendered so by her direct writing style and the frequent inclusion of personal experiences. The book should appeal to a wide spectrum: for the reader new to Islam, it provides a basic education; for those with a moderate or even substantial knowledge of Islam the book will fill in many blanks. Perhaps most in need of this book are those who have been bludgeoned into accepting the air brushed version of Mohammed's religion presented by Muslim Brotherhood front groups such as CAIR and other stealth jihad organizations who present fantasy Islam instead of the genuine article.

[Read More]
The PipeLineNews.org Interview: Nonie Darwish

By CHERYL GATESWORTH

July 5, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - We trust that our readers will enjoy the following interview, having read the previous review of Ms. Darwish’s new book.

Q. When you address young people on college campuses, what are the most frequently asked questions of you?

A. "A lot of young people on college campuses, they ask me, "Aren't you afraid of speaking out?" It's really sad, because my answer is usually, "There are no ideologies or religions in America that are beyond questioning, and I'm not here to offend the good and peace-loving Muslims in any way. My whole family in Egypt are some of the nicest people you'll ever meet, and they're Muslim." I feel that I always want to assure them I'm not speaking about people. My speech is solely about the ideology of Islam."

Q. Have you ever been a victim of organized or spontaneous demonstrations against you?

A. "Oh, yeah. College campuses are usually very [hostile] to anyone who tries to speak against Islam. For me personally, I've been called an Islamophobe, a hater. I spoke at Berkeley one time, years ago. I was invited by the Republican students-David Horowitz actually was doing a series of speaking engagements-and they were very hostile and really condescending, and really insulting to a very extreme level, and I was shocked. They never looked at me as somebody who lived under Shari’a, who lived in the Muslim world for thirty years. They never even cared to understand my viewpoint. It was all, like, mass hysteria against anybody who dares to criticize Islam."

Q. You spoke at UCLA and I attended, and there was an organized demonstration led by [someone from MPAC] which consisted of a walkout. When you spoke, everyone stood up and yelled, "Shame on you."

A." I encounter that all the time, and frankly, right after 9/11 people were hungry for knowing more about why there was terrorism and Islam and why they hate us. I used to speak five and six times a semester, every semester, on college campuses. But the movement against any critique of Islam became so strong that now I'd be lucky to speak one time a semester."

[Read More]
Poland To Muslim Rape-ugees: We Didn’t Invite You, Go Home

July 4, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – Poland, the country the Nazis and Soviets carved up in 1939, starting World War II, has more than a passing acquaintance with totalitarianism, suffering under the boot of various Russian thugs from 1945-1989…thanks to FDR…a separate story and one far beyond the scope of this piece.

Since gaining their independence the Polish people should have been declared the official poster children for what European democracies should look like, but might never again be.

This was emphasized a few days ago during a speech by Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who chairs Poland's dominant political party Law and Justice [PiS], in which he asserted what is heresy among the EU types, that the country has the moral right to tell the hordes of Muslims descending on Western Europe to essentially pound sand:

"We have not exploited the countries from which these refugees are coming to Europe these days, we have not used their labor force and finally we have not invited them to Europe. We have a full moral right to say 'no.'” [Agnieszka Barteczko and Pawel Sobczak, Poland Didn’t Invite The Refugees And Has the Right To Tell Them ‘No,’ Reuters]

The speech is seen as one of defiance in the face of legal moves that the unelected and increasingly imperious EU ruling class in Brussels have taken against the country because of its rejection of multiculturalism.

Poland’s bravery in resisting the EU’s club-footed czars has served as one of the few bright lights on a continent that appears to be rushing towards cultural suicide.

As we noted in a 2015 piece - 40,000 Attend Polish Anti-Islamization March:
 

"Breaking through the chimera created by George Soros and his minions as they seek to destroy the foundations of Western Civilization, 40,000 Poles took to the streets in Warsaw on Wednesday [Polish Independence Day] to protest the influx of jihadist age Muslim males into the country..."

[Read More]
Vatican Calls For 50% Of Social Spending Go To “Immigrants” - Cardinal Turkson Says Immigration Must Be Halted

July 1, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org – It’s difficult to read Catholic publications these days without coming to the conclusion that is now the official doctrine of the Church that national borders mean very little, if anything and that potential immigrants have essentially the same rights as do the native born.

It doesn’t seem to bother the Holy See that this viewpoint is a rejection of more than 350 years of international legal precedent establishing the nature of the modern nation state, which was the central aspect of the Treaty of Westphalia [1648] that ended the Thirty Year War.

Absent enforceable borders, national sovereignty is a myth...

Demonstrating the depth of the rift between the new Church and the state, the most recent edition of the Vatican Observer carries an article making the audacious assertion that not only should “immigration” [read, invasion] be encouraged globally throughout the First and Second Worlds, but that it must be funded on a permanent basis by devoting 50% of governmental expenditures [social spending previously devoted to a nation’s poor] to the new arrivals.

“An undersecretary for the new Vatican office devoted to issues facing migrants and refugees has called on global governments to create a “permanent and generous funding facility” for the areas of the world receiving the largest numbers of migrants. Jesuit Fr. Michael Czerny, one of two undersecretaries for the Migrants and Refugees Section of the new Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, proposed to a roundtable forum in Berlin Wednesday that funds could be split 50-50 between aid to migrants and to local poor in the areas most affected by their arrival…The 50-50 principle…brings us back to one of the key foundations of the Sustainable Development Goals.” [source, Joshua J. Mcelwee, Vatican official calls for global ‘permanent and generous’ funding for migrants , Vatican Observer]

That the statement originates within the Jesuit order is unsurprising, it having a long history of undermining Catholic orthodoxy.

[Read More]
Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner? Siraj Wahhaj, Unindicted Co-Conspirator In First World Trade Center Bombing

WILLIAM MAYER

July 1, 2017 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - Late last evening we received a kind of breathy email announcement by the Islamic Society of North America [ISNA], a Muslim Brotherhood front group and one linked to HAMAS in federal court proceedings, that it was featuring a special guest speaker - Siraj Wahhaj - at its upcoming 54th Community Service Recognition Luncheon.

First, regarding ISNA, the federal courts haven’t been particularly kind, linking it to terrorist groups:

“Federal District Court Judge Jorge Solis in a 2009 decision stated: "The government has produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA, NAIT, with NAIT, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and with Hamas," U.S. District Court Judge Jorge Solis said in the July 1, 2009, ruling...” [source, Federal Judge Agrees: CAIR Tied to Hamas , Investigative Project on Terrorism]

Compounding the bizarre idea that such an organization would even consider bestowing an award of merit, there is the speaker himself, imam Siraj Wahhaj among whose “accomplishments” is having, “appeared on a list of unindicted coconspirators in the trial of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Wahhaj provided testimony during the trial to defend the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel-Rahman, the former leader of the Egyptian terrorist organization, Gama'a al-Islamiyya . Rahman was found guilty of "conspiracy to murder President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt," "solicitation to attack a military installation," and of bombing conspiracy related to a plot to bomb the New York FBI headquarters along with tunnels and other landmarks. During Wahhaj's testimony, he called the Sheik a "respected scholar," also calling him "bold, as a strong preacher of Islam." [Masjid al-Taqwa & Siraj Wahhaj, the Investigative Project on Terrorism]

Additionally Wahhaj has a long history of making statements suggesting that the Constitution should be replaced by Shari’a, “to establish Allah’s deen [creed].”

[Read More]