December 31, 2013 - San Francisco, CA - PipeLineNews.org - It's no secret that the NY Times is a hard left propaganda machine for the Democrat Party. Normally though, it cloaks its slanted journo in such a way as to be marginally believable, assuming the reader is either as dumb as a box of rocks or is a blindered Fascist.
Such is not the case with its today published "expose" regarding the September 11, 2012 attack on the American Embassy located in Benghazi, Libya.
This piece is not only transparently unbelievable, it's so stupid that subscribers should be demanding their money back.
We aren't going to link to the piece, nor are we really going to dissect it because the article simply isn't worth it.
What we will say is that any journo professor worth his red diaper would most likely toss this pap into the waste can if it were submitted by a student aspiring to become a member of the press.
Claiming the sky is red in anything resembling a news story is grounds for an instant "F" and everyone who had anything to do with this monstrosity knows it
Perhaps a flimsy case can be made for the dubious proposition that the Benghazi attack had nothing to do with al-Qaeda central, but claiming, at this late date that the terrorist attack which took four American lives was caused by an amateurish video is a steaming load of crap.
Perhaps Mr. Kirkpatrick's "talents" would be better served explaining how the American landing on the moon was done with mirrors, hand puppets and paper mache...we can hardly wait...one small step towards oblivion for the Times, one giant dose of we told you so.
©2013 PipeLineNews.org LLC. All rights reserved.